You're exactly right, but, that would simply make too much sense.
You're exactly right, but, that would simply make too much sense.
Actually it should be the lawful "possession" of a firearm in and on a vehicle without a CPL.Originally Posted by Yance
You aren't "carrying" it in the glove compartment.
Is Michigan Gun Owners taking any action on this one?
Standing Committee Meeting
Judiciary, Rep. John Walsh, Chair
Date: 05/17/2012
Time: 10:30 AM
Place: 521 House Office Building, Lansing, MI
Agenda:
HB 5225 (Opsommer) Weapons; firearms; certain procedures for purchase and possession of pistols; revise.
HB 5282 (Rendon) Weapons; other; transportation of firearms for lawful purpose; expand.
SB 760 (Green) Weapons; firearms; definition of pistol; modify.
SB 761 (Kowall) Weapons; firearms; definition of pistol; modify.
SB 762 (Robertson) Weapons; firearms; definition of pistol; modify.
Passed 10-1-4 (for-against-pass).
There was a lot of talk about how there were no prosecutions due to this law.
One of the democrats even assured me I have nothing to fear since no one has been prosecuted under this statute yet. He voted against the bill.
Very uneventful and surprising about the lack of opposition at the committee.
HB 5282 of 2012
Weapons; other; transportation of firearms for lawful purpose; expand. Amends sec. 231a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.231a).
Last Action: 5/17/2012 referred to second reading
HB 5282 of 2012
Weapons; other; transportation of firearms for lawful purpose; expand. Amends sec. 231a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.231a).
Last Action: 5/31/2012 transmitted
Thanks for keeping us updated Tallbear. This is one I was not receiving updates on.
HB 5282 of 2012
Weapons; other; transportation of firearms for lawful purpose; expand. Amends sec. 231a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.231a).
Last Action: 6/5/2012 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Wouldn't it be quicker and easier to just seek and opinion from the Attorney General to clarify the law?