Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG….Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<
Freedom Holsters

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: SB 0584, 0585 & 0586 of 2017 Concealed carry in restricted places by certain individuals having completed additional training class

  1. #11
    I'd rather boycott all places restricted and for the ones I cannot avoid, "render unto Caesar."
    NRA Life Member | GOA Life Member

    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti

  2. #12
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie
    Posts
    3,396
    Quote Originally Posted by Divegeek View Post
    So if this passed and I can get Trek from MDFI to make a certificate of completion in MS Paint the Foundation Handgun class I took would already have me ready to go? Yes, ideally criminal empowerment zones would just be eliminated, but as an incremental step I think I can support this. I mean I already take three or four classes a year to stay on top of things, I might as well get a little credit for it.
    Divided, we fall.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by luckless View Post
    Divided, we fall.
    First let me say, I agree with you and want the same thing. That said, how realistic is it that we will ever get constitutional carry in this state? And if we did will it ever include exemptions from PFZ's? It doesnt seem very realistic at all to me. We shouldnt have to pay a fine and take a class to conceal carry now but the majority of us here have done just that. This is another fine and another class to be allowed to do what we already should be allowed but its no different than the one we already submit to for a CPL.

    Even with our best chance in many years to get national reciprocity passed, we are still being told "its not the right time". Even when a bill for constitutional carry seems to be supported we are still being told "its not the right time". No matter what side of the aisle these guys are on, no matter who we elect into office that we think is on our side, the fact is they only care about one thing and thats collecting a paycheck.

    If they want to open the door, for those of us who take the offer, to prove that a pfz zone is nothing but a pipedream of security then so be it. I will take that opportunity and use it to my benefit. We will create a new statistic that shows by allowing us in crime doesnt rise, in fact it may lower in those areas.

  4. #14
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Genesee County
    Posts
    6,351
    Keep in mind, regardless of constitutional carry and/or having the exemption box checked on CPL's, in most cases, the CEZ's are still private property which can prohibit carry at any time.

  5. #15
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    17,024
    Quote Originally Posted by TylerV76 View Post
    Even with our best chance in many years to get national reciprocity passed, we are still being told "its not the right time". Even when a bill for constitutional carry seems to be supported we are still being told "its not the right time". No matter what side of the aisle these guys are on, no matter who we elect into office that we think is on our side, the fact is they only care about one thing and thats collecting a paycheck.
    The one that is spouting that line here in Michigan is the same guy that is the Sponsor of THIS BILL!

    He is also in control of whether the "Con-carry" bills here get a fair hearing. Yet, he says that this is "not the right time" and introduces this!


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Roundballer View Post
    The one that is spouting that line here in Michigan is the same guy that is the Sponsor of THIS BILL!

    He is also in control of whether the "Con-carry" bills here get a fair hearing. Yet, he says that this is "not the right time" and introduces this!
    Didn't realize that. I doubt this, like any other bill, ever sees the light of day.

    Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter