MGO Community Forum  

Go Back   MGO Community Forum > Front Page > Legislative Lighthouse
User Name
Password
MGO Merchandise - Click Here to Check it Out!.............
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Googlemap Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2009, 11:22 AM   #61
Karl
Senior Participant
Associate Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Jordan
Posts: 113
45/70 fan you are correct sir-

see my above post on page 6.
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 11:37 AM   #62
45/70fan
Activist
Associate Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl
see my above post on page 6.

I see that, guess we got the info from the same source.
45/70fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:16 PM   #63
mechredd
Bonafide Gun Guru
Contributing Member
 
mechredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St.Clair County
Posts: 1,958
I just got back from an unsuccessful hunting trip.

The whole time I was there I couldn't stop thinking about what rifle I would want if this law passes. I was considering a rifle chambered in 460 s&w, but then a 450 bushmaster upper came to mind. The 450 with 20 inch barrel is comparable to a .50 cal muzzleloader with a 250 gr bullet over 150 grains of powder.

Muzzleloader performance out of a semi-auto rifle sounds good to me.

What do you guys think?
__________________
If people would stop referring to the Second Amendment as the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and start referring to it as the Right to Provide Adequate Defensive Means to Yourself and Loved Ones, then no one would question its necessity.
mechredd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 09:25 AM   #64
Bestboss
Junior Participant
Associate Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Holt, MI
Posts: 89
I think I have several leverguns that will handle pistol cartridges. Any one of them would be a lot more fun than the heavy 870 I have been carrying around this week. The pistol carbines would be a lot better for several reasons, not the least of which is handling. I just hope they write the law so I could use my older 38-40's and 44-40's. It would be a shame to leave them out.
Larry
Bestboss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 11:51 PM   #65
hawkeyee
Junior Participant
Associate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: trenton
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by hopeitsfast
Glad to have you here and good work getting this bill as far as you have.









Thanks for the bill! Great job !
hawkeyee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2009, Michigan Gun Owners