![]() |
|
|
#61 |
|
Senior Participant
Associate Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Jordan
Posts: 113
|
45/70 fan you are correct sir-
see my above post on page 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Activist
Associate Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
|
Quote:
I see that, guess we got the info from the same source. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Bonafide Gun Guru
Contributing Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St.Clair County
Posts: 1,958
|
I just got back from an unsuccessful hunting trip.
The whole time I was there I couldn't stop thinking about what rifle I would want if this law passes. I was considering a rifle chambered in 460 s&w, but then a 450 bushmaster upper came to mind. The 450 with 20 inch barrel is comparable to a .50 cal muzzleloader with a 250 gr bullet over 150 grains of powder. Muzzleloader performance out of a semi-auto rifle sounds good to me. What do you guys think?
__________________
If people would stop referring to the Second Amendment as the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and start referring to it as the Right to Provide Adequate Defensive Means to Yourself and Loved Ones, then no one would question its necessity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Junior Participant
Associate Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Holt, MI
Posts: 89
|
I think I have several leverguns that will handle pistol cartridges. Any one of them would be a lot more fun than the heavy 870 I have been carrying around this week. The pistol carbines would be a lot better for several reasons, not the least of which is handling. I just hope they write the law so I could use my older 38-40's and 44-40's. It would be a shame to leave them out.
Larry |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Junior Participant
Associate Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: trenton
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Thanks for the bill! Great job ! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|