It doesn't, it just gives an option of concealed. If there is no restriction named, there is no restriction. Open carry remains.Originally Posted by jolari
It doesn't, it just gives an option of concealed. If there is no restriction named, there is no restriction. Open carry remains.Originally Posted by jolari
Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.
No. You still go to the county clerk. The county clerk then sends it to MSP if I understand it correctly.Originally Posted by DP425
I'd agree, but as it stands it's a pretty good bill.Originally Posted by FUBAR31
Bronson
Any chance you could get a clause that states you can carry concealed in a school if its used as a polling place regardless of what the administrator would say?
Also is this bill going to take 2 years to get out of committee like last time?
I would like to know this as well. If this bill passes as is, would it trump current voting laws? Would it be legal for them to deny you access to your designated polling location if you were armed?Originally Posted by durus5995
Also, I would like to know the rational behind the Tea Party's objections with the Secretary of State handling the process. Are they are OK with the State Police doing it? Agreeing to one State entity but not the other makes absolutely no sense to me.
Thanks
The Constitution is NOT dead. It's just being held captive.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
SOS is elected. We have no control over the MSP. Who do you think libertarians would prefer? MSP has been demonstrably anti-gun/anti-gunowner for, like, ever! If you trust the government you will be delighted with MSP's control of the process.Originally Posted by G22
I am not in favor of this at all. There is no reason that a publicly-funded entity (i.e. a school district) should have the ability to deny my 2A rights.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners. Any opinion I express on an issue should not be considered legal advice.
For those interested in establishing an NFA or Gun Trust click here. For my contact information click here. Follow me on Twitter @makowskilegal or my website www.makowskilegal.com
Exactly!Originally Posted by Shyster
How many of these entities will NOT opt out if allowed.
You could still OC in a school. I am in favor. It's better than what we have now, and I'd rather take something that has a chance of passing rather than a dream bill that will go no where. Snyder specifically had a problem with the last bill because of the school carry issue. If this is the price of getting something passed so be it.Originally Posted by Shyster
Perfect is the enemy of good.
Originally Posted by Shyster
I have been following these threads and have a question for you Shyster..with the opt in clause if a school chose not to opt in and a shooting happened on their ground would that put more clout to a lawsuit to be filed against that school for not allowing full protection of there grounds and students??