Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 64
  1. #11
    Legal Forum Contributor / Super Moderator SteveS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ingham County
    Posts
    17,460
    Quote Originally Posted by backhandman View Post
    So when buying a lower from a FFL and requesting it to be bought as a pistol. the FFL is knowingly breaking the law?
    What law would he be breaking?

    Regardless, an FFL that is selling or transferring a receiver should be doing so as "other", not a pistol or rifle. What the buyer does with it is up to them.
    Opinions and comments made by me on this forum should not be considered legal advice.

  2. #12
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Warren
    Posts
    1,283
    idk. You just said he would not be following the law. Just asking.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by backhandman View Post
    So when buying a lower from a FFL and requesting it to be bought as a pistol. the FFL is knowingly breaking the law?
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveS View Post
    What law would he be breaking?

    Regardless, an FFL that is selling or transferring a receiver should be doing so as "other", not a pistol or rifle. What the buyer does with it is up to them.
    Quote Originally Posted by backhandman View Post
    idk. You just said he would not be following the law. Just asking.
    Are you asking the ffl to fill out an RI-60 or just transfer it as a pistol? He should do neither because it's not a pistol. If you build it as a pistol, you submit the RI-60.

  4. #14
    Can anyone cite the law for you being the buyer and seller on an ri60 if you build a AR15 pistol from a lower.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by wizzi01 View Post
    Well you have to build a pistol first. You can't just register the lower as a pistol by itself.
    Wrong. You would be in possession of an unregistered pistol or an SBR



    Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

  6. #16
    Legal Forum Contributor / Super Moderator SteveS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ingham County
    Posts
    17,460
    Quote Originally Posted by oldmann1967 View Post
    Wrong. You would be in possession of an unregistered pistol or an SBR



    Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
    How so?

    This is inconsistent with United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Company, 504 U.S. 505 (1992) and BATFE ruling 2011-4. Michigan does not make you register a lower, so what is the point in registering a lower?
    Opinions and comments made by me on this forum should not be considered legal advice.

  7. #17
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lake Orion
    Posts
    12,907
    Quote Originally Posted by oldmann1967 View Post
    Wrong. You would be in possession of an unregistered pistol or an SBR



    Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
    Seems like you'd have 10 days to turn in paperwork

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by scottzcamaro View Post
    Can anyone cite the law for you being the buyer and seller on an ri60 if you build a AR15 pistol from a lower.
    There's more discussion on this here:
    http://www.migunowners.org/forum/sho...ller-quot-Help!

    I'm just posting this here in case anyone has the same issue and wants to see that thread.

  9. #19
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Southwest Detroit
    Posts
    4,888
    Quote Originally Posted by oldmann1967 View Post
    Wrong. You would be in possession of an unregistered pistol or an SBR



    Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

    Umm how would it be an sbr if you do not put a stock on it? Also, i guess you are in possession of an unregistered pistol as soon as you purchase one...No wait you have 10 days to register a "pistol" after building or purchasing one. If you purchase a stripped lower from an ffl they should be marking the 4473 as other, because that is what it is until you decide if you want to make it a pistol or a rifle.

  10. #20
    Good point in reguards to the sbr. It gets pretty grey with pistol uppers and pistol lowers. Not much case law. Just send the paperwork before ordering the upper IMO. Just to be safe.

    Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter