DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners. Any opinion I express on an issue should not be considered legal advice.
For those interested in establishing an NFA or Gun Trust click here. For my contact information click here. Follow me on Twitter @makowskilegal or my website www.makowskilegal.com
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners. Any opinion I express on an issue should not be considered legal advice.
For those interested in establishing an NFA or Gun Trust click here. For my contact information click here. Follow me on Twitter @makowskilegal or my website www.makowskilegal.com
"Tell Me No Lies, I'll ask you No Questions"
NRA Life Member
MGO Member
NRA RSO
NRA CRSO
MOC Member
Unless otherwise noted, my posts represent my personal opinion, and are not an official position, opinion, or endorsement by MGO or the MGO BOD.
I'd prefer to CC too but I'll take what I can get! I wonder if my .22mag NAA with its belt buckle holster would garner any flak...
I started thinking about this more. I wonder if something small like an LCP in an OWB holster would go quite a bit more unnoticed getting you less flak vs the more noticable full size HK I carry 95% of the time. You could probably keep a tiny gun's view mostly obstructed by your arm while walking and what not. Not my ideal sized gun but if it kept me more off the radar, then it might be the way I'd go.
Legal question:I open carry in a community college after the ruling(assuming wordings are in our favor). I carry my .22mag NAA mini revolver on it's belt buckle holster openly. When asked "Is that real?" would I be subject to any legal issues if I said something like "neh, it's just a lighter"(provided I'm not saying this to a peace officer)?
Last edited by Cocowheats; 02-25-2016 at 04:03 AM.
Interesting question but why lie in the first place when you can say "sure looks real, doesn't it?" Or something similar.
Outstanding.
I now have a better understanding of why attorneys charge so much.
This looks like a huge amount of work and well done.
For fun I changed some of your wording where it would apply to the United States as wishful thinking.
The legislature's concern about a patchwork of state ordinances creating unfair
prosecutions of persons carrying licensed pistols in the United States. Such individuals would inevitably enter States controlled by
authorities where local rules ban conduct licensed and regulated under the Constitution of the United States, creating a
spate of unfair prosecutions in some States for conduct fully lawful elsewhere in the United States.
Such a patchwork of State regulation would create an unfair burden on the courts,
prosecutors, police, and on members of the public engaging in conduct that is allowed by the Constitution of the United States.
Based on my own experience, many months before a hearing; could be anywhere from a couple of weeks to many more months before a decision. We'll probably be waiting for a decision Christmas time. I have seen very quick decisions (less than 2 weeks after the hearing).
The wheels of justice turn slowly. I can see this get consolidated with the other preemption cases, which could lengthen the times. But it might be worth it. I'm hoping to see something like "if the legislature wanted to carve out schools and colleges it could have done so."
All the best,
--esq_stu
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Instructor: Basic Pistol, Personal Protection in the Home, Personal Protection Outside the Home
The above comments are not intended to be and do not constitute legal advice to anyone.