Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

KROGER

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 51
  1. #1
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lincoln Park
    Posts
    11,437

    HB 4474 Allow CPL carry on armory

    HB 4474 of 2017
    Military affairs; facilities; possession of concealed firearms on military premises; allow. Amends 1967 PA 150 (MCL 32.501 - 32.851) by adding sec. 338.
    Last Action: 4/20/2017 bill electronically reproduced 04/19/2017

  2. #2
    MGO LIFE Member MP Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Posts
    7,270
    Is this just a law to support what the guard is already doing?

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Lansing
    Posts
    5,892
    Quote Originally Posted by MP Miller View Post
    Is this just a law to support what the guard is already doing?

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
    Sounds like it. TAG changed policy a few years ago to permit carry.

  4. #4
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    22,562
    Quote Originally Posted by MP Miller View Post
    Is this just a law to support what the guard is already doing?
    Quote Originally Posted by DP425 View Post
    Sounds like it. TAG changed policy a few years ago to permit carry.
    What this does is shift who makes THIS decision to the legislature, and takes it out of the Adjutant Generals' purview.

    It firmly sets preemption for Michigan Military facilities and prevents a future TAG from changing the rules.


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

  5. #5
    MGO LIFE Member MP Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Posts
    7,270
    The TAGs first memo basicly stated that because guard bases are state property, they are preempted by law.

    Sets a fairly strong precedent to me.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Lincoln Park
    Posts
    11,437
    HB 4474 of 2017
    Military affairs; facilities; possession of concealed firearms on military premises; allow. Amends 1967 PA 150 (MCL 32.501 - 32.851) by adding sec. 338.
    Last Action: 5/1/2017 Analysis File Added

  7. #7
    MGO Board of Directors

    President PhotoTom's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    33,707
    HB 4474 of 2017
    Military affairs; facilities; possession of concealed firearms on military premises; allow. Amends 1967 PA 150 (MCL 32.501 - 32.851) by adding sec. 338.
    Last Action: 10/12/2017 Analysis File Added

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...SFA-4474-L.pdf
    Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will Rogers
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

  8. #8
    MGO Board of Directors

    President PhotoTom's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    33,707
    HB 4474 of 2017
    Military affairs; facilities; possession of concealed firearms on military premises; allow. Amends 1967 PA 150 (MCL 32.501 - 32.851) by adding sec. 338.
    Last Action: 10/17/2017 Analysis File Added

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...SFA-4474-F.pdf
    Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will Rogers
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

  9. #9
    MGO Board of Directors

    President PhotoTom's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    33,707
    HB 4474 of 2017
    Military affairs; facilities; possession of concealed firearms on military premises; allow. Amends 1967 PA 150 (MCL 32.501 - 32.851) by adding sec. 338.
    Last Action: 10/17/2017 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
    Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will Rogers
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

  10. #10
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    22,562
    Quote Originally Posted by MP Miller View Post
    The TAGs first memo basicly stated that because guard bases are state property, they are preempted by law.

    Sets a fairly strong precedent to me.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
    There have been a couple advancements of this bill that weren't noted in the thread.

    The House committee offered an H1 amendment, this line was added:

    (3) The adjutant general shall not promulgate rules unduly burdening on the ability of military personnel to possess a concealed weapon as described in subsection (1).
    They HAVE taken it completely out of TAGs control,

    The bill has passed the House, and is now out of committee in the Senate and refereed to the Committee of the Whole.


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter