A good point... I don't seem much of that in my area, but I'm sure State-wide it happens all the time every day. But then again, we are asking typically liberal individuals to use logic to reassess a perceived problem and drop a major component of their party line... that ain't gonna happen.
Additional training is to try and get it signed by the Gov. that doesn't want any guns in any PFZ's. Same reason open carry get's thrown under the bus.
Seams to me there is no respect for the CPL we already have , ok the 8 hr class would be ok but the range time I’m not for that and 94 rounds , I’d have to reload 14 times and that redicklous , I think that was put in as a deturant.
I think our existing CPLs should be enough and the fact that with we have showed that we are responsible CPL owners already.
I agree, but my wrist would be very sore after 94 rounds and at my age I’m not planning on taking more classes unless I have to.
There should be some respect for the CPL’s we already have, we’ve already shown we responsible LPL carriers.
This is far bigger concern for me than anything else.
I don't really want to "throw open carry under the bus", but without this prohibition, the bill would strength gun rights on school grounds. By making a specific preemption carve-out to permit primary and secondary schools to regulate STUDENT possession of firearms (which, are highly unlikely to have a CPL anyway, being the only class of students over 21, are likely severely handicap enough that they don't have gun rights anyway), that gives the clear implication that all other schools and classes of people at schools, cannot be subjected to additional regulations.
But then inserting the line you quoted... Well, now you just severely restricted gun rights on campus. That means not just carry, but people passing through. Now, MSU could literally, arrest people for driving through campus while carrying under a CPL. Or, they could choose to make it a crime to have a firearm on campus at all; just having a long gun properly stored for transport, in your truck could get you arrest. This section is absolutely ludicrous. Without it, I view this bill as a win; sure, it would cost a little extra, but preemption would be further solidified and carry rights essentially, expanded. But with it, not only is it a massive loss of rights, but it turns the state into a patchwork of differing laws.