Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Results 1 to 10 of 14

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Mid Mi
    Posts
    523

    Thoughts on armor piercing bullets in AR pistols?

    Thoughts on armor piercing bullets in AR pistols?

    18 USC 921(a)(17):
    (B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means—
    (i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium;



    I know the M-855 (green tip) are exempt & are OK to use as well as most frangibles are OK to use in an AR pistol but what about some of the new all copper or other all alloy bullets?

    This came up today over morning coffee & shooting BS (or BS shooting, I’m never sure which) when I mentioned I was looking at a super deal on pulled all copper .30 cal bullets.

    It was then brought up that they might be considered armor piercing so I might not be able to legally use in my 300Blk pistols.

    I’m not really worried as all copper look just like FMJ lead core but it would be nice to know the law on this.

    Anybody have anything firm on this?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    4,249
    AP is OK in 30/06, but knot .308 / 7.62 x 51. AR10 can be a pistol, as well as a 300 BO, since most are Pistol gas

  3. #3
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    West of Bravo
    Posts
    7,511
    Do yourself a favor and don't load any projectiles which respond to a magnet in any .30 caliber / 7.62mm cartridge with a cartridge case length shorter than 55mm. The bimetal jacket/lead core projectiles are actually legal, but you cannot prove it without sectioning them. The M1158 and M1159 nonmagnetic tungsten core projectiles are so rare that you don't have to worry about acquiring them in a bulk pulled bullet buy.

  4. #4
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Mid Mi
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by 10x25mm View Post
    Do yourself a favor and don't load any projectiles which respond to a magnet in any .30 caliber / 7.62mm cartridge with a cartridge case length shorter than 55mm. The bimetal jacket/lead core projectiles are actually legal, but you cannot prove it without sectioning them. The M1158 and M1159 nonmagnetic tungsten core projectiles are so rare that you don't have to worry about acquiring them in a bulk pulled bullet buy.

    Good to know, I try to not shoot any magnetic bullets but if I ever do & will section a couple on my band saw & toss them in my kit.

    What about the full copper-alloy bullets starting to show up?

  5. #5
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    West of Bravo
    Posts
    7,511
    Quote Originally Posted by slingshot77 View Post
    What about the full copper-alloy bullets starting to show up?
    You should be OK with pure copper bullets, but 18 USC 921(a)(17) never defined brass, bronze, or beryllium copper alloys. Some alloys with as much as 97% copper content are colloquially known as brass, bronze, or beryllium copper alloys. This has never been tested in court, but you don't want to be the guy who gets to fund the court test.

  6. #6
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Mid Mi
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by 10x25mm View Post
    You should be OK with pure copper bullets, but 18 USC 921(a)(17) never defined brass, bronze, or beryllium copper alloys. Some alloys with as much as 97% copper content are colloquially known as brass, bronze, or beryllium copper alloys. This has never been tested in court, but you don't want to be the guy who gets to fund the court test.
    Do you think the standard (available) copper bullets would fall under the definition of-- "a projectile which the Attorney General finds is primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes"?

    I know (well read anyhow) that Remington got in jam of some sort a while back with some copper bullet .223 rounds.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter