Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG….Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<
MGO / MOC joint picnic--- Aug 25, Fowlerville CLICK——>>HERE<<—CLICK

Close Quarters Tactical

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: SB 0934, 0935, 0936, 0937 & 0938 of 2018 - Expand Background Checks & Eliminate CPL Holders from exempted individuals for "Gun Free School Zones"

  1. 04-15-2018, 02:16 PM #11
    zigziggityzoo
    zigziggityzoo is offline
    Administrator zigziggityzoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    16,648
    I could just as easily see this as an avenue to CLOSE registration, by simply amending the law to remove the requirement to turn them in for pistols, too.
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
    “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” --Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    NOTHING IN THIS POST CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE. Please consult an attorney for all legal matters.
    ALL of the posts I make are my own, and do not speak for MGO as a forum or as an organization.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-15-2018, 02:43 PM #12
    PhotoTom
    PhotoTom is offline
    Administrator PhotoTom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    21,900
    Quote Originally Posted by zigziggityzoo View Post
    I could just as easily see this as an avenue to CLOSE registration, by simply amending the law to remove the requirement to turn them in for pistols, too.
    I don't think the folks behind these bills are looking to loosen any Michigan gun laws...

    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-15-2018, 02:47 PM #13
    zigziggityzoo
    zigziggityzoo is offline
    Administrator zigziggityzoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    16,648
    Quote Originally Posted by PhotoTom View Post
    I don't think the folks behind these bills are looking to loosen any Michigan gun laws...
    The people behind the bills aren't in control of the house or senate.
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
    “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” --Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    NOTHING IN THIS POST CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE. Please consult an attorney for all legal matters.
    ALL of the posts I make are my own, and do not speak for MGO as a forum or as an organization.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-15-2018, 03:55 PM #14
    PhotoTom
    PhotoTom is offline
    Administrator PhotoTom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    21,900
    Quote Originally Posted by zigziggityzoo View Post
    The people behind the bills aren't in control of the house or senate.
    But…a lot of good that has done us in the last few years!

    The feel-good movement right now is to enact more restrictive gun laws…not only is it "for the children"…it is being pushed for by the children (kind of)...

    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-15-2018, 04:53 PM #15
    Roundballer
    Roundballer is offline
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    18,376
    Possible? -------------> Probable?


    Reasonable? ----------> Actual?

    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-15-2018, 06:52 PM #16
    71commander
    71commander is offline
    MGO Member 71commander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Waterford, MI
    Posts
    702
    The feel-good movement right now is to enact more restrictive gun laws…not only is it "for the children"…it is being pushed for by the children (kind of)...
    And will be signed without hesitation by our Governor.
    NRA member
    USPSA Chief Range Officer
    US Army
    Patriot Guard rider
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-15-2018, 08:19 PM #17
    fatskater
    fatskater is offline
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    491
    Shouldn't they be doing the same on "refugee's" and illegals. Wait, pretty much the same group. But shouldn't they.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-15-2018, 08:42 PM #18
    Leader
    Leader is offline
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Livingston Co.
    Posts
    16,510
    Quote Originally Posted by zigziggityzoo View Post
    The people behind the bills aren't in control of the house or senate.
    Are you sure?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-15-2018, 08:49 PM #19
    zigziggityzoo
    zigziggityzoo is offline
    Administrator zigziggityzoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    16,648
    Quote Originally Posted by Leader View Post
    Are you sure?
    Fair point... It's hard to find a pro-gun legislator in Lansing.
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
    “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” --Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    NOTHING IN THIS POST CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE. Please consult an attorney for all legal matters.
    ALL of the posts I make are my own, and do not speak for MGO as a forum or as an organization.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-29-2018, 05:17 PM #20
    langenc
    langenc is offline
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Montmorency Co, MI
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by PhotoTom View Post
    SB 0934 would require a purchase permit or CPL for all firearm buyers (i.e., all firearms sales, including long guns, would require a background check, FFL or private).

    There is language in SB 0934 that stops the process short of having to return copies of the completed license to purchase (LTP, i.e., "purchase permit") or RI-60 (sales record for purchases where a CPL was used in lieu of a purchase permit) to the police for registration purposes. In other words, this bill does not expand the Michigan Handgun Registration to include all firearms.
    What it does NOT do is get rid of handgun registration. I will be bending Triston Coles ear on that tomorrow.
    There is only one reason why we have registration-to control blacks from getting guns in the late 1800s so.
    Never solved a crime yet. I believe I read last fall the MSP would even let it go, at least would not oppose.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
 MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter