Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

KROGER

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Mask free in the gunshine state!
    Posts
    20,586

    Child care provider sues Illinois!

    Child care provider sues after Illinois tells her to choose between gun rights and business

    By David Sherfinksi
    The Washington Times
    April 22nd. 2018



    An Illinois woman who runs a child care service out of her home is suing the state, saying its restrictions on day care facilities make it illegal for her to keep a gun in her house for self-defense.

    Jennifer Miller’s lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for central Illinois after the state emerged as a battleground in the post-Parkland gun debate, with citizens and various localities trying to stake claims on either side of the issue.

    Mrs. Miller and her husband, Darin, both hold concealed-weapons permits. But Illinois’ rules prohibit handguns from being kept in day care homes, with exceptions only for law enforcement or others who have to carry guns for their jobs.

  2. #2
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    1,493
    Why does the left care more about protecting criminals than it does about law abiding citizens? My only guess is the criminals are part of their constituency.

  3. #3
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Mid Michigan
    Posts
    3,621
    Quote Originally Posted by fatskater View Post
    Why does the left care more about protecting criminals than it does about law abiding citizens? My only guess is the criminals are part of their constituency.
    Because they are criminals themselves...

  4. #4
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Mask free in the gunshine state!
    Posts
    20,586
    Quote Originally Posted by fatskater View Post
    Why does the left care more about protecting criminals than it does about law abiding citizens? My only guess is the criminals are part of their constituency.
    So very well said!

  5. #5
    Account Closed Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East Lansing
    Posts
    342
    They sincerely believe that a gun is a greater liability and risk to the safety of good, innocent people than it is a tool for a positive use by good people against against evildoers. So in the aggregate, their view is that fewer guns means less risk of avoidable harm. If that means someone can’t defend themselves, that is a sad fact but so be it, because the overall greater good is advanced by disarmament.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by computeruser View Post
    They sincerely believe that a gun is a greater liability and risk to the safety of good, innocent people than it is a tool for a positive use by good people against against evildoers. So in the aggregate, their view is that fewer guns means less risk of avoidable harm. If that means someone can’t defend themselves, that is a sad fact but so be it, because the overall greater good is advanced by disarmament.
    This is exactly how many liberals feel/think,they honestly believe that people must be saved from themselves. I know because I used to work in office full of them.

  7. #7
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    sw michigan
    Posts
    5,095
    Quote Originally Posted by fatskater View Post
    Why does the left care more about protecting criminals than it does about law abiding citizens?
    What you have said here could actually be a very good flaming arrow continually shot a candidates progressive opponent. Or even a certain political party could use it as they advance pro-gun legislation, that is if they really wanted to advance pro-gun legislation.

  8. #8
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    2,810
    Do it for the children.

    Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    liberals think the law doesn't apply to them

  10. #10
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    SE MI
    Posts
    181
    Michigan DHS uses their own interpretation of their ability to manage ‘hazardous materials’ in foster homes to attempt to control guns. The law is clearly meant for household chemicals but they try to extend it. My experience is that it is enforced differently by each caseworker.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter