Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: PSA AR15 pistol

  1. #21
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    7,274
    Quote Originally Posted by DEVIL DOG View Post
    So nice I can't believe it's even legal. The SB for the PAP actually allows me to insert my wrist in the brace. The gun is waaaay to heavy for me to shoot it one handed, but I can certainly see where a disabled person COULD with enough training. The SBA3 on the other hand does NOT open up enough to get your wrist through it. The TAIL HOOK either. The SBA3 is really pushing it if you ask me. Hard to guess why the ATF allowed it to happen. Don't get me wrong, I do like it. Just seems contradictory to ATF reality.
    This will either lead to SBR laws being tossed, which I doubt, or they'll eventually be illegal. I'm more shocked that binary triggers are legal and are still considered semi-auto.

    Both of these things won't be an issue until they're used in a crime or shooting.

  2. #22
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    22,570
    Quote Originally Posted by GreaseMonkeySRT View Post
    This will either lead to SBR laws being tossed, which I doubt, or they'll eventually be illegal. I'm more shocked that binary triggers are legal and are still considered semi-auto.

    Both of these things won't be an issue until they're used in a crime or shooting.
    It is not so much that they are "semi-auto", it is that they ARE NOT full auto.

    The most popular configuration for a trigger on any firearm is that the activation is from the application of pressure. Yet, there are also configurations of "release triggers", whereas the firing mechanism is tripped upon the release of the pressure. Those are usually found on trap guns.

    The binary trigger just combines the two configurations into one unit. Which of the two types would you write a law against so that you could say that the pull and then release of the trigger are a single activation that fires more than one round so that you can say it is full auto?

    This is why the ATF can not legitimately prohibit bump-fire stocks. The firearm has to be pulled forward to activate a single function of the trigger, and has to be repeated for every round fired. This is not the same as with the xcelerator (sp? not going to look it up) stock that contains a spring in the stock that gets compressed under recoil and then pushes the firearm back forward, activating the trigger, and continues firing until the finger is removed from the trigger.


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter