Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 52
  1. #21
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Washtenaw
    Posts
    5,449
    I am going to answer this thread by throwing in my ideas as they jump to my head. My writing might not be coherent in terms of listing an argumental discussion, but i will just narrate things that I experienced first hand and why do I keep the 40SW in my handgun collection.

    When I started shooting in 2009, i started with 9mm. Pretty soon going into 2010 there was a huge ammo shortage and the ammo shelves were empty except for 40 SW ammo. And that's when I bought my first 40 SW handgun an HK USP 40. After that I got a glock 22 and a sig P229 in 40. So what initiated me to shoot 40SW was really the ammo shortage of 9mm during the panic times.

    After I started shooting 40SW occasionally i realized that from a defensive point there is really not much advantage over 9mm. However, I started realizing that I am developing better techniques to control the 9mm handguns more effectively. I started a theory that I like to practice with 40SW on a handgun platform and shoot competitions with 9mm. I still do that from time to time. Shooting a 40SW handgun keeps you on your tip toes in terms of paying attention to the grip fundamentals controlling recoil and muzzle rise. I usually explain it to my friends it is like going to the gym to stay fit and in shape for playing other sports.. Shooting 40 keeps you on your top shape in managing recoil and muzzle flip for shooting competitively with 9mm.

    As of 2010 I started reloading, what I realized is that 9mm round is unforgiving in terms of accuracy. the round needs to be loaded in close proximity to maximum range to maintain good accuracy. That is not the case with 45 ACP and 40SW.. These two rounds could be down powered and still maintain accuracy and surprisingly same impact point at certain load ranges. (plus or minus). Playing with a 40 SW round it could be loaded to power factors similar to the 9mm round (in proximity of 125,000 as per IDPA standard) and what is interesting is that the recoil will be buffed down to a 9mm recoil) with maintained accuracy. So if I run my 40 in an IDPA match I will not be at a disadvantage from the typical 40 recoil as compared to people shooting 9mm. Yes I know that it makes more sense to shoot 9 all the time, but there is always an option to shoot minor 40 loads and not be at a disadvantage. May be i was too lazy and didn't reload 9 for the match, or I am out of money and short on 9mm bullets, etc.. it is always nice to have a back up plan and know your options.

    Another reason I keep the 40SW in my calibers is because I shoot bowling pins matches.. Certain bowling pins setups are friendly for 9mm (narrower shelves) but the norm is wider shelves and you need enough power factor to knock off the pins off the table.. 40 and 45 is what most shooters use in this category. I toggle between 40SW and 45 ACP when I shoot pins. Plus sometimes it is so much fun to shoot a hard recoiling gun and maintain a respectable pace of energy management, it is just pleasing to me personally. Something like racing a rough car and winning with it.

    Do I need a 40SW, the answer is no. because I compete mostly in 9mm, I carry mostly a 9mm, and when power factor is needed in a bowling match a 45 ACP will do the job.
    But is there a place for 40SW in my collection, the answer is Yes. Because it is readily available in periods of ammo shortages, very forgiving to reload from minor to major power factor, the recoil could be used for extra training in recoil management, and it is always good to have more options if your budget allows it.

    Add to all of this the price of guns in 40SW.. They are at about 20 to 30% lower in the same platform and model as compared to 9mm.. If you are a reloader and like to have that particular model and want to save money, you can buy it in 40 SW and your options are: either down power your reloads to minor PF and enjoy the lower recoil, get a 40 to 9 conversion barrel down the line, or just shoot it in 40 and enhance your recoil management techniques to shoot it effectively to a 9mm handgun.
    Last edited by JimSig; 10-03-2018 at 04:25 PM.

  2. #22
    MGO Member somecrazygreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Farmington Hills, MI
    Posts
    4,010
    Meh. 9mm is better in every way.

    The gel testing/wound patterns are pretty similar, but with 9mm you get more capacity, cheaper ammo, less recoil that allows for faster follow up shots.

    .40 is pointless, that's why the FBI dropped it, and THEY'RE the ones who invented it.

    If you want something bigger than 9mm, buy a 10mm. I'd skip .40 and .45. Hell, with 10mm you get more capacity AND more power than .45.

    With the modern guns these days, I really don't see any point in shooting .40 or even .45 most of the time, because 9mm and 10mm are better at absolutely everything.

  3. #23
    MGO Board of Directors

    Secretary matt11's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    48185/49631
    Posts
    4,817
    A few years ago a buddy was selling a Sig 229 elite in .40. I liked how it felt in my hand and it was a good deal so I bought. I like to shoot it, and can hit what I shoot at, night sites help this. The hammer section of the safe is a bit larger than the striker side. MY EDC is a S&W 1911 ES. only 7+1 I hope I never need it. My first handgun was a .44 Mag, pretty soon Ill be down to a 9mm. ( actually do have one or so..)

  4. #24
    Super Moderator Mr. Waverly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mid-Michigan
    Posts
    1,945
    Lots of good points made, and I especially liked JimSig's "ramblings." As I said in my original post (I think?), I am looking at .40 as a range gun. From what I have gathered from your input, adding a .40 will be a hoot at the range.

  5. #25
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Saginaw Twp (the good part)
    Posts
    10,688
    adding a .40 will be a hoot at the range.
    Damn right

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Columbia, sc
    Posts
    941
    Let me just condense all the facts to one succinct statement.

    9 mm is for women with very small hands and weak demeanor.

  7. #27
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Washtenaw
    Posts
    5,449
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Waverly View Post
    Lots of good points made, and I especially liked JimSig's "ramblings." As I said in my original post (I think?), I am looking at .40 as a range gun. From what I have gathered from your input, adding a .40 will be a hoot at the range.

  8. #28
    In Memoriam tenthumbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Lapeer County
    Posts
    9,905
    Quote Originally Posted by somecrazygreek View Post
    Meh. 9mm is better in every way.

    The gel testing/wound patterns are pretty similar, but with 9mm you get more capacity, cheaper ammo, less recoil that allows for faster follow up shots.

    .40 is pointless, that's why the FBI dropped it, and THEY'RE the ones who invented it.

    If you want something bigger than 9mm, buy a 10mm. I'd skip .40 and .45. Hell, with 10mm you get more capacity AND more power than .45.

    With the modern guns these days, I really don't see any point in shooting .40 or even .45 most of the time, because 9mm and 10mm are better at absolutely everything.
    Bah humbug! Damn Canadians and their metric system!

  9. #29
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Northville, MI
    Posts
    1,339
    It doesn't do anything better than .40 S&W, which is why the agency that created it dropped it and other LE agencies are following suit. Back in the 90s it was better because bullet technology sucked but now the big three pistol cartridges (9x19, .40 S&W, .45 Auto) all perform nearly identically with modern ammo. There's no reason to get a .40 or .45 for personal defence unless you have a sentimental attachment to the cartridge.

    It still has a practical use in competition guns because of power factor rules but that's about it. Get a .40 if you want, I think they're fun to shoot, but I wouldn't keep one as a defensive weapon if a comparable 9mm was available.

  10. #30
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Monroe
    Posts
    163
    I bought a couple 40 slides for my 9,s
    Enjoy shooting the 40,s more (just me).
    FBI went to 9mm because it was easier for female agents to shoot & qualify with the 40.

    The 9 will do but why have a will do when you can have a can do.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter