Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

KROGER

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waterford, Michigan
    Posts
    167
    After reading this a little more closely, I have some serious reservations about supporting this. The age bothers me. This should be 18, not 21.We allow 18 year olds to purchase shotguns and rifles; there is no reason for the age to be 21. Furthermore, there is a section that states: "(5) An authorized dealer or other person who sells a device that uses electro-muscular disruption technology to an individual described in subsection (2)(C) shall verify the individual's identity and verify that the individual holds a valid concealed pistol license issued under section 5b of 1927 PA 372, MCL 28.425b..." I don't see the purpose of this language if subsection (2)(A) allows anyone over 21 to purchase one.

  2. #12
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    22,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Purebass04 View Post
    (5) An authorized dealer or other person who sells a device that uses electro-muscular disruption technology to an individual described in subsection (2)(C) shall verify the individual's identity and verify that the individual holds a valid concealed pistol license issued under section 5b of 1927 PA 372, MCL 28.425b..." I don't see the purpose of this language if subsection (2)(A) allows anyone over 21 to purchase one.
    One portion is talking about stun guns, the other portion is talking about tasers. You still need the CPL for a taser, not for a stun gun.


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

  3. #13
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waterford, Michigan
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by Roundballer View Post
    One portion is talking about stun guns, the other portion is talking about tasers. You still need the CPL for a taser, not for a stun gun.
    Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.

  4. #14
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Eastpointe (formerly known as East Detroit)
    Posts
    878
    CPL check, now say I want to get a tazer...do I have to get zapped by it like the cops do in training (which it funny, because they aren't required to get shot in order to carry a firearm)?

  5. #15
    MGO Board of Directors

    President PhotoTom's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    33,706
    HB 4020 of 2019
    Weapons; other; purchase and possession of stun guns; allow for individuals over age 21. Amends sec. 224a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224a).
    Last Action: 12/2/2019 Analysis File Added

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...0-659A5B8E.pdf
    Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will Rogers
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

  6. #16
    MGO Board of Directors

    President PhotoTom's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    33,706
    HB 4020 of 2019
    Weapons; other; purchase and possession of stun guns; allow for individuals over age 21. Amends sec. 224a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224a).
    Last Action: 1/8/2020 Analysis File Added

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...0-BF9D37A4.pdf
    Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will Rogers
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

  7. #17
    MGO Member luckless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie
    Posts
    5,102
    They can pass it but I won't count it as a "win" and I'm not thanking anyone for it.
    Just me

    Instructor: Basic Pistol, PPIH, PPOH, Hunter Safety
    NRA Life Member
    President of the Chippewa County Shooting Association

  8. #18
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    22,562
    There is another piece of very important info in there too.

    1/8/2020 Expected in
    HJ 1 read a second time
    1/8/2020 HJ 1 Pg. 18 substitute (H-1) adopted
    1/8/2020 HJ 1 Pg. 18 placed on third reading
    They passed an H1 substitute bill, all that that does is lower the 21yr age to 18yr.
    It has been read a second time and will be read for a third time soon. Urge you Representative to vote YEA!


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

  9. #19
    MGO Member luckless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie
    Posts
    5,102
    Quote Originally Posted by Roundballer View Post
    There is another piece of very important info in there too.



    They passed an H1 substitute bill, all that that does is lower the 21yr age to 18yr.
    It has been read a second time and will be read for a third time soon. Urge you Representative to vote YEA!
    Missed the substitute. I called her office to object to the bill leaving out 18- 20 aged citizens. I'll support it, now.
    Just me

    Instructor: Basic Pistol, PPIH, PPOH, Hunter Safety
    NRA Life Member
    President of the Chippewa County Shooting Association

  10. #20
    MGO Board of Directors

    President PhotoTom's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wayne Co. MI
    Posts
    33,706
    HB 4020 of 2019
    Weapons; other; purchase and possession of stun guns; allow for individuals over age 21. Amends sec. 224a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224a).
    Last Action: 1/14/2020 transmitted

    Passed the House 84 to 24 with 1 not voting
    On to the Senate...
    Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will Rogers
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter