Transport with CPL

[Roundballer]

That's contrary to what Shyster has previously written.

I am not sure what part you are talking about. Shyster is the one that pointed out to me where it was.
I over simplified the concept in listing it here, but I also linked to the actual laws so the conditions could be read. Yet it still makes the separation (conditionally) required. The other place it is listed is excepted by the license with a CPL.

Considering this thread has nothing to do with drinking. let's stay on topic shall we.

You are correct that the thread is not about drinking, it is about carrying. One of the conditions of carrying is the subjects sobriety, therefore it can't be totally be ignored.

[partdeux]

There is zero reason WITH A CPL for separating ammo from a firearm, unless drinking is involved.

Question makes zero sense if BAC is not involved.

[Roundballer]

Question makes zero sense if BAC is not involved.

Actually it makes plenty of sense. Most people only read until they make a judgement of the content. Often it about something that is very narrowly defined, but people attach a global circumstance to it.

The hunting laws make a statement that .22 cal and smaller is prohibited for dear hunting. And people spread that all over the place, "no .22 for deer hunting". But that is not what the law says. It says no .22 cal or smaller RIMFIRE for deer hunting.

[Citoricx]

CPL means you can carry a pistol concealed on your person or in your vehicle. It doesn't matter where in your vehicle it is. So the answer is no to all three.

Exactly...pretty common sense scenario if you ask me.