Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

KROGER

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Macomb
    Posts
    1,816

    Exclamation Measuring the Overall Length of a Pistol? ATF has Altered the Deal

    https://www.recoilweb.com/measuring-the-overall-length-of-a-pistol-atf-has-altered-the-deal-151346.html?fbclid=IwAR2Jo9X91V1alRTaVgWox2shXvP10 CavGcmJnMEDjZ6vO14WbI2wigctiGk



    "The letter states:

    [Firearms Technology Industry Services Branch] FTISB has previously determined that “stabilizing braces” may be assembled on firearms as accessories… In contrast to stocks on rifles or shotguns…”stabilizing braces” are merely accessories and not relevant to the classification of a “pistol” under the statutory definition. That is, a folding stock on a rifle or shotgun is included in overall length measurements because the firearm must be “designed or redesigned….and intended to be fired from the shoulder” to be so classified. The stock is therefore an essential element in the statutory definition."

    In the letter, ATF also specifies that:

    [m]akers also create an artificial overall length measurement by attaching a folding stabilizing brace. Such a measurement would be problematic because the firearm could avoid classification as an “AOW,” yet retain the conceivability and remain fully functional. Measuring a folding (or telescoping) stabilizing brace would therefore undermine the comprehensive statutory and regulatory design of the GCA and NFA.…The measurement of a folding or collapsible stabilizing brace in the overall length of a firearm creates an artificial overall length that would permit a maker to avoid classification as an NFA “firearm” without a viable design purpose or legal justification.

  2. #2
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Downriver
    Posts
    1,073
    Seem to impact the greater than 26” with a vertical fore grip if a folding adaptor is used the most.

  3. #3
    MGO Board of Directors

    Trustee CyborgHunter's Avatar


    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Macomb County, MI
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Samurai Jack View Post
    https://www.recoilweb.com/measuring-the-overall-length-of-a-pistol-atf-has-altered-the-deal-151346.html?fbclid=IwAR2Jo9X91V1alRTaVgWox2shXvP10 CavGcmJnMEDjZ6vO14WbI2wigctiGk



    "The letter states:

    [Firearms Technology Industry Services Branch] FTISB has previously determined that “stabilizing braces” may be assembled on firearms as accessories… In contrast to stocks on rifles or shotguns…”stabilizing braces” are merely accessories and not relevant to the classification of a “pistol” under the statutory definition. That is, a folding stock on a rifle or shotgun is included in overall length measurements because the firearm must be “designed or redesigned….and intended to be fired from the shoulder” to be so classified. The stock is therefore an essential element in the statutory definition."

    In the letter, ATF also specifies that:

    [m]akers also create an artificial overall length measurement by attaching a folding stabilizing brace. Such a measurement would be problematic because the firearm could avoid classification as an “AOW,” yet retain the conceivability and remain fully functional. Measuring a folding (or telescoping) stabilizing brace would therefore undermine the comprehensive statutory and regulatory design of the GCA and NFA.…The measurement of a folding or collapsible stabilizing brace in the overall length of a firearm creates an artificial overall length that would permit a maker to avoid classification as an NFA “firearm” without a viable design purpose or legal justification.
    Can we get a legal beagle (lawyer) in here, please, to unravel this reeking pile of double-speak?
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

  4. #4
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Downriver
    Posts
    756
    Don't put a vertical fore grip on your brace equipped pistol.

  5. #5
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Southwest Detroit
    Posts
    4,887
    The angled fore grip is allowed on a pistol and to me is more comfortable with shorter setups.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by wizzi01 View Post
    The angled fore grip is allowed on a pistol and to me is more comfortable with shorter setups.
    Until they decide they want to change their opinion on that. AFG is only allowed because they say so. For now.

  7. #7
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Downriver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by kbdm View Post
    Don't put a vertical fore grip on your brace equipped pistol.
    If an AR pistol then measure length from end of buffer tube to end of barrel WITHOUT arm brace. If it has a folding adaptor then measure length in folded position.

    Only use a vertical fore grip if over 26 inches and never conceal carry it if it has a vertical fore grip.
    Last edited by Michaelk; 07-07-2019 at 09:02 AM.

  8. #8
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    3,805
    Name:  4CWzJds.jpg
Views: 273
Size:  9.0 KB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter