Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

KROGER

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    MGO Board of Directors

    Trustee Jackam's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Flint, Mi
    Posts
    15,217
    I bought a brush-hog from a guy and just before taking possession he wanted a picture of my DL. I let him, but it still grinds me that I did. I should have taken a page from Midlandshooter's book and walked.
    "But then there are plenty of gun folks who think no one should rock the boat because it might piss off the anti gun crowd/politicians and cause even more gun control." - Bikenut
    Submissive gun rights advocates need to lose their submissiveness before we lose our 2A rights.

  2. #12
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Posts
    454
    Quote Originally Posted by Jackam View Post
    I bought a brush-hog from a guy and just before taking possession he wanted a picture of my DL. I let him, but it still grinds me that I did. I should have taken a page from Midlandshooter's book and walked.
    I'm not sure what the logic is behind confirming the identity of someone buying a tractor implement but I totally understand wanting to do it for items where ownership is registered/tracked.

    Several years ago I sold a motorcycle to a guy a couple hours away. I collected payment, signed over the title, and moved on with my life. A few months later, I received a notice from an impound yard warning me that I needed to pay a big towing/storage bill or they'd be sending it to collections. What had happened was that the person I sold the motorcycle to "flipped" it. He never did anything with the registration and then sold it on to a third person. That person ran a light and hit a car broadside in a city intersection, totalling the bike. What I learned was that without a valid Michigan bill of sale, which has very specific requirements, that the bike was still my responsibility. That whole experience cost me a bunch of money and even more hassle.

    So now I'm very careful to verify who I'm dealing with and keeping records for items that can easily be tracked back to me down the road. Vehicles and firearms both fit those categories.

    There's nothing very confidential on your driver's license and even less on your CPL.

  3. #13
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    7,277
    Quote Originally Posted by Parkanzky View Post
    I'm not sure what the logic is behind confirming the identity of someone buying a tractor implement but I totally understand wanting to do it for items where ownership is registered/tracked.
    Brush hogs are extremely dangerous weapons of war that have no place on our streets.

  4. #14
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by midlandshooter View Post
    Nope. I'd walk.

    Pretty ****ed up dude didn't warn you he was a tight assed idiot beforehand.
    As I mentioned in my first post, when I told him I didn't want him to take pictures of my ID's, he agreed to proceed with the sale without pictures. He was not disrespectful or a jerk about it. There is no need to call him names. It was a civil transaction.

    People who do this do it to protect themselves from our horrible gun laws. I don't blame them for being extra cautious, I just don't see the need to have a picture of my ID when all the info they legally need is on the paperwork and if they retain their copy of the form, it proves they sold the gun. But again, this is down to personal preference, and that is FINE. I don't care what you want to do, just as long as you inform me upfront.

    If I don't want to purchase something because the seller wants pictures of my ID, that should not bother them. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who don't care who has pictures of their ID who would love to purchase the firearm.

    My opinion is that we have to give up way too much information already as it is in this state so I'm not going to give more than what is required by law.

  5. #15
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Howell
    Posts
    11,700
    Quote Originally Posted by GreaseMonkeySRT View Post
    Brush hogs are extremely dangerous weapons of war that have no place on our streets.
    Agree. Every year, tens of thousands of hogs lose their lives to criminal and negligent use of brush hogs.

  6. #16
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Howell
    Posts
    11,700
    The beauty of all this is that a buyer is under no obligation to purchase a product and a seller is under no obligation to sell a product if they both don't agree to the terms.

    Sellers wants a copy of your ID and you don't want to provide it? You're free to walk. Buyer isn't willing to provide you with a copy of his ID and you want it? Tell him to walk. Done and done. Easy peasy.

    I do agree with 93bandit: If you're going to want a copy of an ID, let the buyer know up front. Although I'm an FFL, I make sure that my customers know up front that I will be keeping a copy of their ID and CPL with their completed 4473, and that even though they may send me electronic copies ahead of time, I need to see the physical card(s) when the pick up their purchase.

  7. #17
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Southern
    Posts
    21
    .gov has done good work brainwashing the populace

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter