Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    MGO Board of Directors

    Trustee Jackam's Avatar


    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Flint, Mi
    Posts
    15,215
    Man oh Man!
    If it ain't for you, don't rain on anyone else's parade.

    It's worth taking a look at.

    Myself, I wouldn't pass judgement on it until I've played with it.
    "But then there are plenty of gun folks who think no one should rock the boat because it might piss off the anti gun crowd/politicians and cause even more gun control." - Bikenut
    Submissive gun rights advocates need to lose their submissiveness before we lose our 2A rights.

  2. #12
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Livonia
    Posts
    8,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Jackam View Post
    Man oh Man!
    If it ain't for you, don't rain on anyone else's parade.

    It's worth taking a look at.

    Myself, I wouldn't pass judgement on it until I've played with it.
    Not raining on anyone's parade, just giving an opposing viewpoint so that others can make an informed decision. I don't do groupthink.

  3. #13
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    holly
    Posts
    7,969
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtmcgirt76239 View Post
    Doesn't it need to fix a problem? What problem did this solve ?
    Being able to fire when folded....while it is of very very limited use, being able to fire while folded isn’t useless

  4. #14
    In Memoriam Forum User
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    MACOMB TWP., MI
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnS624 View Post
    And??? Folding stocks were designed for storage/compactness. That's why airborne and armored troops used them. They weren't designed that way to be shot with the stock folded. I shoot my long guns from the shoulder.
    Then I guess you don't need one!

  5. #15
    MGO Board of Directors

    Trustee


    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Now far south of the city: FAR.
    Posts
    11,433
    I was gonna say it's stupid without a 1913 rail on the back of it to attach all the newfangled modern folders...
    but then i clicked the link and i'm kind of interested. would make for an interesting PDW

    EDIT - holy crap - $399
    o f no
    DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. The opinions expressed in this post are those of the author, DrScaryGuy. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of MGO, its board of directors, or its members.

  6. #16
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    holly
    Posts
    7,969
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnS624 View Post
    And??? Folding stocks were designed for storage/compactness. That's why airborne and armored troops used them. They weren't designed that way to be shot with the stock folded. I shoot my long guns from the shoulder.
    They were designed for compactness in use not storage...paratroopers and tankers would both love more compactness but not if folding it disables it

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter