Originally Posted by
nmuskier
It's amazing how only the 9mm took advantage of bullet design improvements. One would think ammunition manufacturers would apply that technology to all of their defensive lines?
In a pistol like the Shield, where there is a 1 round difference, the .40 seems like a sound performance advantage. "More rounds" on target really doesn't apply. Maybe in a service pistol where the capacity difference is more significant? Then, I wonder why the capacity argument rarely comes up when debating 9mm vs. .357 SIG?