Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by flatapple View Post
    Benched the revolver...solid rest...all in the same group...low and right!
    Send it back.

    More than a few Ruger fans, say that the SP101 has had more problems in a short time than the GP100 has ever had.

  2. #12
    Marketplace Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,457
    Have someone else with experience shooting fire that gun. See if the problem is you or the gun? Then go from there. Good Safe Shooting, MOOSE

  3. #13
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    novi
    Posts
    345
    all I am saying is it is far easier to hit POA at closer distances. 2 inches off at 36 feet is pretty good for defensive shooting. Again, don't shoot someone at 36 feet.

  4. #14
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    holly
    Posts
    7,969
    Quote Originally Posted by eric View Post
    all I am saying is it is far easier to hit POA at closer distances. 2 inches off at 36 feet is pretty good for defensive shooting. Again, don't shoot someone at 36 feet.
    Yeah cause everybody knows that you can’t be in fear for your life from someone 36 feet away

    Please quit spreading silly wives tales

    There’s no distance requirement for self defense...especially the 21foot rule you referenced lol

  5. #15
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    novi
    Posts
    345
    who are you? I beg to differ. At 36 feet, intruder has opportunity to flee, AND you have an opportunity to divert ALSO. Don't test it !!

  6. #16
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    holly
    Posts
    7,969
    Quote Originally Posted by eric View Post
    who are you? I beg to differ. At 36 feet, intruder has opportunity to flee, AND you have an opportunity to divert ALSO. Don't test it !!
    Like I said you don’t know what you are talking about
    Yes As distance increases it gives you more options but to try and state an absolute is idiotic nonsense
    What if the bad decides not to take the chance you so graciously gave him???
    Even an out of shape person can cover 36!feet in a matter of seconds, a bullet can cover it in a fraction of a second

  7. #17
    MGO Member Roundballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
    Posts
    22,562
    Quote Originally Posted by eric View Post
    who are you? I beg to differ. At 36 feet, intruder has opportunity to flee, AND you have an opportunity to divert ALSO. Don't test it !!
    There are several of us that have been reading your posts and are really wondering how you came up with any of that. Your beliefs are just not true.

    The "21 ft defence zone" does not exist, that whole idea came from an article written back in '83 by Dennis Tueller, and has been reffered to as "The Tueller Drill" ever since.

    Here is the truth of things: The Tueller Drill myth why the 21 foot rule isn't a rule at all. By Dennis Tueller


    Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter