Welcome to MGO's Internet Discussion Forums…Please Consider Becoming a Dues-Paying Member of the ORG…Click >>>>>HERE<<<<< for more info…………****DONATIONS**** can also be made toward MGO's Legal Defense Fund and/or MGO's Forums >>>>>HERE<<<<<

Firearms Legal Protection

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44
  1. #11
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Kalamazoo
    Posts
    2,240
    RB is correct. It was the 1899 Hague Convention. Declaration IV, Section 3.

    https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/dec99-03.asp

    The Contracting Parties agree to abstain from the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core, or is pierced with incisions.
    The US never signed that particular section.

  2. #12
    Super Moderator RifleGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dearborn Heights... the South one.
    Posts
    11,072
    Necessary? No.
    A well placed shot is necessary. Hollow points may increase the efficacy of that shot, somewhat, but a well-placed ball round will do the job.

    But this opinion is worth exactly what you paid for it......
    Life is too serious to take too seriously.
    DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.

    NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
    Celebrate Recovery! Member & Group Coach

  3. #13
    MGO Member Fuel Fire Desire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Belleville
    Posts
    4,362
    Depends entirely on its purpose. My .45 colt snub uses Keith bullets for maximum penetration, and the large meplat on the Kieth performs much better than a FMJ. My .45 ACP uses HST’s to prevent over penetration. One is for critters in the woods, the other for the city. Similar size, weight, and velocity, but two entirely different roles.

    The HST expands to 0.85” in gel testing by Lucky gunner with 14” of penetration. Pretty impressive. The Ranger T in the same test opened up to 1.0”. That’s just incredible......and really good for putting on the brakes in a target and preventing over penetration/ collateral damage/ maximum transference of energy....but not necessarily good for getting into the vitals of a large animal coming at you with a frontal shot.

  4. #14
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Livonia
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by mudoven View Post
    Specifically, do you really think you have to run hollow points in certain powerful/large calibers? The 230 grain FMJ .45 ACP served our military well for a very long time and will definitely get the job done, as will magnum offerings (.357, .41, .44, .500, etc) featuring round nosed lead or wadcutter bullets.

    The only downside I see regarding the aforementioned caliber/bullet combinations would possibly be over penetration, but other than that, what do you all think?
    Powerful and large are two different things. If metal hitting meat and delivering energy and wounds is the goal their is context and compromise. A deer gun that is light and will also cut through brush, shooting a body wearing quilted canvas winter clothes or a body in armor while not over penetrating somebody in a t-shirt is the same as the shell choice for 16-inch/50-caliber Mark 7 naval guns shooting various ship types. Your shells blow right through the aircraft carrier's hanger and hull sides if you shoot AP fused for the deck/belt armor of a battleship.
    Last edited by GreenBull; 02-04-2021 at 12:30 AM.

  5. #15
    Its a poor value and poor risk reward scenario to not carry one of the top hollow points.

    No matter if you have an anemic .25, .32, or a 45 or 10mm all things being equal you want too performance of the proven highly regarded top hollow points.

    Anything less you are short changing yourself.

  6. #16
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Livonia
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtmcgirt76239 View Post
    Its a poor value and poor risk reward scenario to not carry one of the top hollow points.

    No matter if you have an anemic .25, .32, or a 45 or 10mm all things being equal you want too performance of the proven highly regarded top hollow points.

    Anything less you are short changing yourself.
    I load ball in the winter and HP in the summer in 9x18. What you say might be good for any .38+P and up but not below that. I've seen 9x18 HP bullets not make it to through 2 layers of quilted cloth turnout/work coat, a synthetic weave shirt and a cotton under shirt over meat when ball ammo would. I saw that test with my own eyes.

  7. #17
    MGO Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Branch, Brown City
    Posts
    2,499
    Speer gd hp in 30 carbine I guess is an incredible round for that particular caliber

  8. #18
    MGO Member Ol` Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    the dog house
    Posts
    10,676
    Quote Originally Posted by Roundballer View Post

    Actually it was one of the Hague conventions that addressed ammo. The Geneva Convention mostly addressed the treatment of prisoners.

    We also never signed The Hague convention and are not limited in ammo type.
    "Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".

    The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray

  9. #19
    MGO Member CyborgWarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Manistee
    Posts
    6,817
    45 ACP Ball ammo is like a freaking death ray.
    Accept Climate Change: ADAPT!!!

  10. #20
    I am a Forum User
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Three Rivers, MI
    Posts
    2,545
    There are very few calibers I wouldn't carry with a quality HP such as the HST or the Gold Dot +P.

    Primary thing here is, all handgun rounds suck.

    You have a small permanent wound cavity, and they are going to slow to cause hydrostatic shock. 9mm - .45acp with a quality HP performs about the same across the board with modern ammo design, so give me the most controllable with a high round count.

    Now it has been shown due to the slow speeds of some .38s and .380s that the hollow points don't reach the minimum for 12" penetration in gel tests...these are the only place I would think about carrying a FMJ, as there are quite a few SMEs on the subject and that's what they recommend.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
only search Michigan Gun Owners Forums
MGO's Facebook MGO's Twitter