HB 5220 of 2017
Weapons; other; purchase and possession of certain self-defense spray concentration; allow under certain circumstances. Amends sec. 224d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224d).
Last Action: 11/7/2017 bill electronically reproduced 11/02/2017
HB 5220 of 2017
Weapons; other; purchase and possession of certain self-defense spray concentration; allow under certain circumstances. Amends sec. 224d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224d).
Last Action: 11/7/2017 bill electronically reproduced 11/02/2017
Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will RogersDISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
Looks like it is essentially just proposing taking the legal limit of oleoresin capsicum from 10% to 18%.
Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will RogersDISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
HB 5220 of 2017
Weapons; other; purchase and possession of certain self-defense spray concentration; allow under certain circumstances. Amends sec. 224d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224d).
Last Action: 12/4/2017 Analysis File Added
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...0-76FFFACF.pdf
Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will RogersDISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
HB 5220 of 2017
Weapons; other; purchase and possession of certain self-defense spray concentration; allow under certain circumstances. Amends sec. 224d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224d).
Last Action: 2/7/2018 referred to second reading
Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will RogersDISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
It will be interesting to see who will oppose this.
I also would like to see who actually does oppose, but most of that will not be done in the open where we can see it.
I expect opposition from anyone that is exempt from that law: MCL 750-231
Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.
HB 5220 of 2017
Weapons; other; purchase and possession of certain self-defense spray concentration; allow under certain circumstances. Amends sec. 224d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224d).
Last Action: 2/13/2018 Analysis File Added
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docume...0-4FBAAC7D.pdf
Don't let yesterday use up too much of today - Will RogersDISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners.
We missed a little movement on this one:
2/7/2018 HJ 13 Pg. 204 reported with recommendation without amendment
2/7/2018 HJ 13 Pg. 204 referred to second reading
It is out of committee and back to the house for voting.
This part is also interesting:
That part also kind of angers me. The MSP should not have any voice in law making. It is one thing to have an individual (who happens to be a cop) testifying, but having an MSP "representative" (a part of the Executive branch) regularly weighting in as "pro, neutral or con" is wrong.POSITIONS:
A representative from Damsels in Defense testified in support of the bill. (12-5-17)
A representative from the Michigan State Police indicated a neutral position regarding the bill. (12-5-17)
Analysis as Reported From Committee (2/13/2018) is a pretty good read.
Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.
Having MSP input angers me too. They are not a lobbying group, their salaries come from tax payer money. Having to get the the opinions from the MSP looks to much like a "police State."
It is one way the governor exerts his influence. The MSP does what the governor tells them. He is their boss and they are his personal lobbying arm.