Not everyone looks there.... something as important at this should be more places.
Results 21 to 30 of 716
Thread: S.B. 0610 SBR/SBS
-
10-10-2013, 10:28 AM #21I am a Forum User
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Warren
- Posts
- 1,283
-
10-10-2013, 11:32 AM #22MGO Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- I/C "Gateway to the Thumb" Lapeer County
- Posts
- 22,572
Do you see the contradiction in your statement?
Originally Posted by backhandman
What makes this bill more (or less) important than any other bill listed in Legislative Lighthouse? Is this more important than removing CEZ's, Pistol caliber rifles in the shotgun zone?
If bills were important to people, then the people would be looking where all of the bills are posted. It should be there (it isn't yet), then people would know WHERE to look for it. It is a thread about a bill, and a duplicate at that, it should be where all the rest are.
Life Member, NRA, Lapeer County Sportsmen's Club Disclaimer: I Am Not A Lawyer. Opinions expressed are not representative of any organization to which I may belong, and are solely mine. Any natural person or legal entity reading this post accepts all responsibility for any actions undertaken by that person or entity, based upon what they perceived was contained in this post, and shall hold harmless this poster, his antecedents, and descendants, in perpetuity.
-
10-10-2013, 12:35 PM #23I am a Forum User
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Lincoln Park
- Posts
- 11,437
S.B. 0610 SBR/SBS
SB 0610 of 2013
Weapons; firearms; manufacture, possession, or transfer of certain short-barreled shotguns or rifles; allow. Amends sec. 224b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224b).
Last Action: 10/9/2013 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
-
10-10-2013, 01:39 PM #24I am a Forum User
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Milan
- Posts
- 16,297
So, this bill would allow us to own one but not transfer it? I'm at work, couldn't read the whole thing.
-
10-10-2013, 01:42 PM #25MGO Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Dundee
- Posts
- 2,748
No it basically brings us in line with Federal law. Fill out the form, pay $200, wait 6 months, then you can bring your new toy home. Originally Posted by Walther
-
10-10-2013, 01:53 PM #26Legal Forum Contributor / Super Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Wixom
- Posts
- 9,206
The bill is being fast-tracked and is up for a committee vote on 10/15
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or official policies of Michigan Gun Owners. Any opinion I express on an issue should not be considered legal advice.
For those interested in establishing an NFA or Gun Trust click here. For my contact information click here. Follow me on Twitter @makowskilegal or my website www.makowskilegal.com
-
10-10-2013, 02:17 PM #27MGO LIFE Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 2,384
It's not necessarily more important in general, but it is likely more important to people interested in SBRs who are more likely to be here than in the legislative lighthouse. Originally Posted by Roundballer
-
10-10-2013, 02:48 PM #28I am a Forum User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- The Hills
- Posts
- 7,249
MGO's Grassroots should be ALL over this. Officially.
Just emailed my RINO. Originally Posted by oldmann1967
Last edited by Pyzik; 10-10-2013 at 02:54 PM.
-
10-10-2013, 03:31 PM #29MGO Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Birch Run
- Posts
- 587
Called Sen. Kahn's office, he is a pro gun guy.
-
10-10-2013, 04:06 PM #30MGO Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Canton
- Posts
- 312
The thing that sucks is that while my state senator is an Colbeck (R), my state rep is Slavens (D). Not that I think it will make a difference, but can someone type up an eloquent and articulate letter supporting passage of SBR/SBS that might sway a democrat?
Reply With Quote
|
